布鲁盖尔-IFRS-Sustainability-Requires-Further-Governance-Reform_8页_155kb

IFRS Sustainability Requires Further Governance Reform

Core Content

The document discusses the need for governance reform to ensure the sustainability of IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) in the face of increasing challenges. It highlights the political and strategic issues affecting the IASC Foundation (now IFRS Foundation), particularly the loss of support from the global investment community, a key stakeholder group. The author, Nicolas Véron, argues that the Foundation must shift its focus to investor-centric governance and reassess its convergence strategy with US GAAP and Japanese standards.

Main Views

• Governance Reform is Critical: The IASC Foundation has not effectively represented the global investment community, leading to a loss of confidence. A more transparent and representative governance structure is necessary to ensure the sustainability of IFRS.
• Convergence Strategy is Flawed: The current effort to harmonize IFRS with US GAAP is viewed as potentially counterproductive, leading to a "race to the bottom" rather than a "race to the top" in terms of standards quality.
• Investor Representation is Underdeveloped: The global investment community is not adequately represented by existing industry bodies, and the Foundation must take direct steps to involve them in its governance framework.
• Political Capture Risk: The Foundation's shift toward a country-based funding model and the establishment of a Monitoring Board could increase the risk of political capture and poor technical outcomes.

Key Recommendations

1. Strategic Readjustment

• The IFRS Foundation should reorient its strategy to focus on investor-centric governance.
• A clear and sustainable course should be charted to overcome the current obstacles and potentially change leadership.
• The Constitution Review should be extended to a Part 3, focusing on making the Foundation more investor-focused.

2. Representation and Participation

• The global investment community should be actively represented within the Foundation’s governance structure, including the Monitoring Board.
• The Foundation should develop mechanisms for inclusive and representative participation from all users of financial information.
• A transnational approach to funding and representation should be considered, rather than a country-based one.

3. Constitutional Changes

• Name Streamlining: The proposed name changes for IFRS, IFRS Board, and IFRS Foundation should be adopted as they simplify terminology.
• Objectives Review: The Foundation's objectives in Article 2 of the Constitution should be re-evaluated, with:
  • "Acceptable" replacing "Accepted" to refer to standard development, not adoption.
  • "Emerging economies" being replaced with a broader reference to economic diversity.
  • Convergence as an objective should be deleted or downgraded, as it is not as important as other goals.
• Geographical Balance: The selection criteria for Trustees should be based on objective metrics such as population, GDP, savings, and market capitalisation to ensure geographical fairness.
• Rejection of Accelerated Due Process: The proposed accelerated due process should be rejected, as it risks lowering standards quality and eroding trust.

4. Trustee Engagement

• Trustees should be more active in public debates and discussions about accounting standards.
• The Chair of the IASB has been the primary voice in public engagement, which is unsustainable.
• The Trustee role should be enhanced to ensure greater transparency and accountability.
• The Chair position should ideally be full-time, and the dual role of IASB Chair and IFRS Foundation CEO should be eliminated.

Conclusion

The IFRS project is at a critical juncture, with governance and convergence strategies under scrutiny. To ensure long-term sustainability, the Foundation must reorient itself toward investors, redefine its strategic goals, and adopt a more transparent and representative governance model. These changes are essential to restore confidence and avoid political capture, ensuring that IFRS remains a high-quality, globally accepted standard.