1999年-世界发展银行全球_Managing_Terms_of_Trade_Volatility_4页_414kb
报告摘要
Managing Terms of Trade Volatility Summary
Core Content
Terms of trade (ToT) volatility is a significant source of macroeconomic instability, particularly in commodity-dependent economies. It can lead to slower economic growth, worsened income distribution, and increased risk of currency crises. The document outlines the challenges posed by ToT shocks and explores strategies for mitigating their effects, focusing on the roles of the financial system, government institutions, and the private sector.
Main Points
1. Terms of Trade Shocks as Fiscal Shocks
- ToT shocks are not only direct economic shocks but also contribute to macroeconomic volatility through their impact on fiscal and monetary outcomes.
- They can destabilize fixed exchange rate regimes and increase the likelihood of currency crises.
- Macroeconomic volatility from ToT shocks hampers economic and social development, reducing growth and investment in physical and human capital.
2. Why ToT Shocks Are Disruptive
- Private Sector Vulnerability: Commodity price shocks can lead to investment booms or busts, causing large fluctuations in relative prices and real exchange rates, which in turn affect capital returns and investment demand.
- Financial System Strains: Commodity booms increase demand for domestic deposits, potentially leading to lending booms and financial instability. Conversely, busts can cause sharp contractions in lending if banks lack liquidity.
- Public Sector Vulnerability: In oil-exporting economies, the public sector bears the brunt of ToT shocks. Political decision-making processes can lead to mismanagement and amplify the negative impacts of these shocks.
- Political and Institutional Factors: Fiscal policy is often procyclical due to political dynamics and institutional weaknesses, which can lead to destabilizing responses to shocks.
3. Strategies for Managing ToT Shocks
a. Strengthening the Financial System
- Capital and Liquidity Requirements: Banks in volatile economies should have higher capital and liquidity requirements to withstand shocks.
- Internationalization of Banking: Encouraging internationalization can reduce the financial system's dependence on domestic commodity cycles.
b. Institutional Reforms for the Public Sector
- Transparency in Fiscal Decision-Making: Establishing an autonomous fiscal scorekeeper can help monitor fiscal deficits and compliance with fiscal rules.
- Delegation of Fiscal Authority: Assigning fiscal decision-making to the executive branch can improve responsiveness.
- Intertemporal Solvency Constraints: Imposing limits on fiscal deficits can ensure long-term solvency and prevent over-spending during booms.
c. Commodity Price Stabilization Funds
- These funds aim to promote self-insurance by limiting government spending based on commodity revenues.
- However, they are ineffective due to the fungibility problem, where governments can easily borrow from stabilization funds without adhering to fiscal rules.
- Example: Colombia's oil stabilization fund has not had a noticeable impact on fiscal behavior.
d. Private Sector Hedging
- The private sector should be encouraged to hedge against commodity price risks, but this requires a stable legal and institutional environment.
- Hedging contracts may be unavailable or unenforceable due to inadequate legal frameworks.
- Incentives for Hedging: The social benefits of hedging often exceed private benefits, suggesting that public policies may be necessary to encourage it.
Key Information
- Fiscal Policy: Procyclical fiscal policy exacerbates the effects of ToT shocks, especially in Latin America.
- Political Dynamics: The political process can lead to poor fiscal responses, making institutional reforms essential.
- Role of Governance: Governance and political economy issues are major barriers to effective public sector hedging.
- Private Sector Behavior: Without a supportive environment, private sector hedging is limited, and the costs of volatility are borne by society.
Conclusion
Managing terms of trade volatility requires a multi-faceted approach that includes strengthening the financial system, reforming fiscal institutions, and creating an environment that supports private sector hedging. While commodity stabilization funds may offer some benefits, they are not a substitute for institutional reform. The document emphasizes the importance of policy coherence and the need to address both technical and political obstacles to ensure stable and sustainable economic growth.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载