20160421-DBS_Group-Accelerating_SOE_reforms_to_benefit_four_groups_60页_1mb

SOE Reform Analysis Summary

Core Content

This document provides an in-depth analysis of the accelerating SOE (State-Owned Enterprise) reforms in China during 2016-2020, emphasizing the structural supply-side issues and the positive market implications of these reforms. It outlines the reasons for reform, past experiences, and identifies potential beneficiaries in the stock market.

Main Points

• SOE Reforms as a Key Strategy: SOE reforms are identified as a critical tool to address China's structural supply-side problems, including overcapacity and inefficiencies.
• Supply-Side Issues: These are attributed to SOE inefficiencies, local protectionism, distorted input prices, and an over-reliance on state-owned banks for financing.
• Credit Boom Impact: The 2009 credit boom exacerbated overcapacity in energy and resource sectors, increasing the urgency for reform.
• Reform Roadmap: The current reforms focus on mixed ownership, corporate governance, and asset restructuring rather than full privatization.
• Positive Market Impact: The reforms are seen as market positive, with potential benefits for specific groups of companies, including those that benefit from supply cuts, asset restructuring, employee share incentives, and improved balance sheets.
• Learning from Other Countries: The document references successful SOE reforms in other countries, particularly Singapore, to support the argument that China's current approach is on the right track.

Key Information

1. Reasons for Quicker Reforms

• Structural Supply-Side Problems: SOEs are a root cause of overcapacity and inefficiency due to distorted incentives, local protectionism, and input price distortions.
• Financial System Stress: The declining return on invested capital (ROIC) of SOEs and their reliance on cheap financing and subsidies threaten the financial system.
• Demographics and Compensation Fund: China's demographic changes and a Rmb100bn compensation fund make it easier to cut redundant workers.

2. Expected Reform Roadmap (2016-2020)

• Mixed Ownership and Governance: The focus is on mixed ownership, corporate governance, and asset restructuring rather than full privatization.
• Reform Cases: Recent SOE reforms have included mergers and acquisitions, asset restructuring, introduction of mixed ownership, and employee share incentives.
• Government and Party Influence: SOE executives are often government and Party officials, leading to decisions that prioritize social stability over market efficiency.

3. Lessons from Other Countries

• Successful Reforms: Other countries' SOE reforms, particularly in Singapore, were successful due to careful planning, restructuring before privatization, and avoiding rushed processes.
• Singapore's GLCs: The development and global expansion of Singapore's state-owned companies (GLCs) are highlighted as a model for China's reform efforts.

4. Market Impact and Beneficiaries

• Positive Impacts: Academic studies suggest SOE reforms can improve profitability and efficiency.
• Stock Market Performance: Recent SOE reform announcements have generally been positive for share prices.
• Four Groups of Beneficiaries:
  • Supply Cut Beneficiaries: Companies that benefit from reducing overcapacity.
  • Asset Restructuring and Mergers: Firms with potential for restructuring and mergers.
  • Early Employee Share Incentives: Companies implementing share incentive schemes for employees.
  • Improved Balance Sheets: Firms with potential for better corporate governance and financial performance.

Key Beneficiaries Table

Conclusion

The document concludes that SOE reforms are necessary and beneficial for China's economy, with a focus on mixed ownership, corporate governance, and asset restructuring. It highlights that the current reform approach is well-aligned with international best practices and that the identified groups of companies are likely to benefit from these reforms. The analysis also underscores the importance of careful implementation to avoid the pitfalls of previous reform attempts.