卡内基国际和平基金会-Afghanistan-The-Impossible-Transition_30页_2mb

Afghanistan: The Impossible Transition

Core Content

This paper by Gilles Dorronsoro analyzes the challenges facing the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan, particularly in the context of the 2011 withdrawal and the broader strategic transition. It highlights the fundamental flaws in the coalition's counterinsurgency strategy and the growing instability in key regions. The author argues that the coalition's military approach is not only failing to achieve its goals but is also undermining the possibility of a political solution.

Main Viewpoints

• Military and political failure: The coalition's strategy is failing due to the lack of progress in both military operations and political negotiations.
• Inability to transition: The Afghan National Army (ANA) and police forces are not yet capable of maintaining security independently, making the 2014 transition unrealistic.
• Impact of U.S. withdrawal: A premature withdrawal would create a security vacuum and weaken the coalition's position, increasing the likelihood of Taliban dominance.
• Pakistan's role: Pakistan is actively opposing the U.S. and is not cooperating in counterinsurgency efforts. Its support for the Taliban remains strong, and its military operations in the border regions have had little effect.
• Insurgency's strength: The insurgency is growing stronger, especially in regions near the Afghan-Pakistani border, and is not only local but also includes transnational groups like al-Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba.
• Population's opposition: The Afghan population is increasingly hostile to foreign troops, and the coalition's presence is seen as intrusive and ineffective.
• Development aid's limited impact: While development projects have been implemented, they have not significantly improved security or state control, as the Afghan government remains weak and untrusted.

Key Information

• Current military strategy: The coalition's strategy focuses on securing major roads and cities, with an emphasis on counterinsurgency operations. However, these operations have not led to a reduction in attacks or losses.
• Regional focus: The paper emphasizes the importance of the "Eastern Triangle" and Loya Paktia, which are key areas for insurgent activity and strategic significance.
• Coalition's limitations: The coalition's forces are becoming more fragmented, with a binary structure of bases and special operations. This has led to a loss of territory and an increase in insurgent attacks.
• Taliban's strategic advantage: The Taliban is using the instability and lack of government control to strengthen its position, especially in areas close to the border with Pakistan.
• Political dynamics: The Afghan government is not trusted by the population due to corruption and weak institutions. The support for the government is limited to certain local powers and former commanders.
• Negotiation barriers: The U.S. strategy of military pressure is preventing meaningful negotiations with the Taliban. A political agreement is essential but currently unattainable due to the coalition's stance.
• Impact of U.S. policies: The U.S. has been involved in local power struggles, which have led to increased tensions and instability. These actions have also alienated the local population and undermined the coalition's credibility.

Conclusion

The paper concludes that the coalition's current strategy is unsustainable and that a political solution is the only viable path forward. The author stresses that the U.S. must abandon its military-centric approach and engage in meaningful dialogue with the Taliban. This is necessary not only to avoid a military and political vacuum but also to ensure long-term stability in the region. The relationship with Pakistan is critical, and the U.S. must find a way to cooperate with Islamabad, even if it means compromising on some of its military objectives.

Summary of Key Sections

The Coalition's Shrunken Space

• The coalition's military presence is diminishing due to the binary structure of bases and special operations.
• The focus on securing roads and cities has not translated into broader security gains.
• Insurgent movements are largely unrestricted, especially in border regions.
• The withdrawal of U.S. forces from isolated valleys and border outposts has led to increased insurgent activity in other areas.

The Population's Support

• Initial support for the coalition has waned due to perceived injustice, corruption, and the presence of foreign troops.
• The population views coalition operations as intrusive and often harmful.
• Development programs have not effectively secured support, as they are seen as intelligence-gathering efforts.
• The coalition's involvement in local power struggles has alienated the population and fueled insurgent recruitment.

The Afghan Government

• The ANA and police forces are not autonomous or well-equipped.
• The government has limited control over key regions, especially those near the Pakistan border.
• Corruption and weak institutions have eroded public trust.
• Local tribes and former commanders play a significant role in the political landscape, often opposing government efforts.

The Insurgency

• The insurgency is gaining strength, particularly in areas close to the Pakistan border.
• It includes both local and transnational groups, such as the Taliban and al-Qaeda.
• The coalition's military operations are not effectively targeting the insurgency's core, and the lack of progress in negotiations is a major obstacle to a political resolution.

The Missing Link

• A political agreement with the Taliban is essential for a sustainable solution.
• The U.S. must recognize the need to re-evaluate its strategy and shift towards diplomacy.
• Cooperation with Pakistan is crucial, but the U.S. has limited leverage and must be willing to compromise.