战略与国际研究中心-North-Korea-s-2-Million-Medical-Bill-for-Otto-Warmbier_7页_297kb
报告摘要
Summary of U.S. Detainees in the DPRK
Core Content
The document outlines the history of U.S. citizens detained in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) since 1994, focusing on the circumstances of their arrests, detentions, and eventual releases. It highlights the challenges faced by the U.S. in securing the release of its citizens due to the lack of formal diplomatic representation in North Korea. The Swedish Ambassador serves as the de facto representative for U.S. interests in the country.
Main Points
Frequency and Nature of Detentions
- Detentions of U.S. citizens in the DPRK have occurred periodically since 1994.
- The frequency has increased in recent years, with notable cases in 2009 and 2012.
- Most detentions are related to illegal entry, espionage, or alleged anti-state activities.
- Some individuals were detained for religious activities or misunderstandings regarding North Korea's policies.
Key Individuals and Their Detentions
| Name | Dates of Detention | Reason | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Edward Fowle | May 7, 2014 – October 21, 2014 | Left a Bible and personal items in a restaurant | Released without trial |
| Matthew Todd Miller | April 10, 2014 – Present | Illegal entry, asylum claim, espionage | Sentenced to 6 years of hard labor |
| Merrill Newman | October 26, 2013 – December 7, 2013 | Illegal entry, alleged war-related activities | Deported after apology and admission of wrongdoing |
| Kenneth Bae | November 3, 2012 – Present | Alleged anti-DPRK activities, religious rhetoric | Still detained, sentenced to 15 years of hard labor |
| Eddie Jun Yong-su | November 2010 – May 28, 2011 | Illegal entry, missionary work | Released after intervention by former President Jimmy Carter |
| Aijalon Mahli Gomes | January 25, 2010 – August 26, 2010 | Illegal entry, unspecified hostile act | Released after Jimmy Carter's humanitarian mission |
| Robert Park | December 25, 2009 – February 5, 2010 | Illegal entry | Released without trial |
| Euna Lee and Laura Ling | March 17, 2009 – August 5, 2009 | Illegal entry while filming | Released after Bill Clinton's visit |
| So Sun Dok | September 29, 1999 – November 19, 1999 | Military espionage | Expelled after admission of guilt |
| Karen Jung-Sook Han | June 17, 1999 – July 20, 1999 | Humanitarian mission | Deported after apology |
| James Chin-Kyung Kim | September 1998 – October 24, 1998 | Suspected of being a spy | Expelled after admitting good intentions |
| Reverend Kwang-Duk Lee | May 27, 1998 – August 31, 1998 | Spying charges | Expelled after apology and pressure from U.S. officials |
| Evan Carl Hunziker | August 24, 1996 – November 27, 1996 | Illegal entry | Released after family paid a fine |
Key Information
- Legal Context: The DPRK often charges U.S. citizens with "anti-DPRK crimes," which can include espionage, illegal entry, and distributing anti-state materials.
- Release Conditions: Many detainees were released after admitting guilt, apologizing, or paying fines. Some were released due to humanitarian efforts or diplomatic pressure.
- Diplomatic Efforts: U.S. officials, including former presidents (Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter) and special envoys (Robert King), have been involved in securing the release of detained U.S. citizens.
- Conditions of Detention: Detainees reported harsh treatment, including torture, isolation, and forced labor.
- Legal Representation: The U.S. lacks formal diplomatic ties with the DPRK, relying on Sweden as the intermediary for official communications and detainee visits.
Conclusion
The detention of U.S. citizens in the DPRK has been a recurring issue in U.S.-North Korea relations, often tied to legal and political tensions. While the U.S. has used diplomatic and humanitarian channels to secure their release, the process is complex and influenced by the DPRK's legal framework, the individuals' actions, and the geopolitical context. The cases highlight the risks and challenges faced by U.S. citizens entering North Korea, as well as the role of high-profile diplomatic engagement in facilitating their return.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载