20131125-穆迪服务-Argentine_Sovereign_Market_Risk_Measures_Improve_on_Settlement_of_Minor_Dispute_with_Foreign_Investors_16页_1mb
报告摘要
Moody's Sovereign Risk Report Summary
Core Content
This report from Moody's Capital Markets Research (CMR) provides an analysis of market-based risk measures for sovereign debt, focusing on Argentina and other countries in the Asia-Pacific, Europe, and Latin America & Caribbean regions. It highlights how market signals, such as credit default swap (CDS) implied probabilities of default and ratings, reflect the perceived credit risk of sovereign issuers.
Main Points
-
Argentina's Risk Measures:
- Argentina's five-year cumulative CDS-implied EDF (Expected Default Frequency) dropped significantly from 41.76% on September 2 to 25.64% in the past week.
- The decline was primarily due to the settlement of a minor dispute with foreign investors by the World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
- Despite the improvement, Argentina's EDF remains the highest among the 84 sovereign entities in the dataset.
- The one-year EDF for Argentina is still higher than the five-year annualized metric, which is unusual and indicates potential financial distress.
-
Moody's Analytics:
- CMR is part of Moody's Analytics, which is distinct from Moody's Investors Service (MIS), the rating agency.
- CMR does not provide investment advisory services or products.
- Market-based risk measures are derived from CDS spreads, adjusted for loss-given default and the market price of risk.
-
Economic Policies:
- Argentina's President returned after six weeks of medical leave, and the new Minister of Economics is linked to the nationalization of YPF SA, suggesting continuity in populist economic policies.
- Moody's Investors Service continues to rate Argentina B3 with a negative outlook and its foreign-law bonds at Caa1.
-
EDF and Credit Curve:
- Normally, longer-term EDF measures are higher than short-term ones, similar to an upward-sloping yield curve.
- In cases of financial distress, short-term EDF measures can exceed longer-term ones, similar to a negative credit curve.
- Countries that required financial rescue (e.g., Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Cyprus) had higher one-year EDF measures than five-year ones before their rescues.
Key Information
Asia-Pacific
| Country | CDS Implied-EDF (1-Year) | Bond Implied-Rating | Senior Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | 0.02% | Aaa | Aaa |
| China | 0.04% to 0.03% | Baa2 to Baa3 | Aa3 |
| Hong Kong | 0.02% | Baa1 | Aa1 |
| Indonesia | 0.13% to 0.16% | Ba1 to Baa3 | Baa3 |
| Japan | 0.03% | Aaa | Aaa |
| Korea | 0.03% | A3 | A3 |
| Malaysia | 0.06% to 0.05% | Baa2 to Baa2 | A3 |
| New Zealand | 0.01% to 0.02% | Aa3 | Aaa |
| Philippines | 0.05% to 0.06% | Baa2 to Ba1 | Baa3 |
| Singapore | -- | -- | Aaa |
| Sri Lanka | 0.28% to 0.41% | B2 to B1 | B1 |
| Taiwan | 0.06% to 0.05% | -- | Aa3 |
| Thailand | 0.06% to 0.06% | Baa2 to Ba1 | Baa1 |
Europe
| Country | CDS Implied-EDF (1-Year) | CDS Implied-Rating | Bond Implied-Rating | Senior Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 0.01% | Aa1 | Aaa | Aaa |
| Belgium | 0.03% to 0.01% | A2 to Aa2 | Aaa | Aa1 |
| Bulgaria | 0.06% to 0.07% | Baa2 to Ba3 | Baa2 | Ba1 |
| Croatia | 0.24% to 0.33% | B1 to Ba3 | Ba2 | Ba1 |
| Czech Republic | 0.03% | A3 | Aa2 | Aa1 |
| Denmark | 0.01% | Aaa | Aaa | Aaa |
| Estonia | 0.03% | A3 | Baa2 | Baa3 |
| Finland | 0.01% | Aaa | Aaa | Aaa |
| France | 0.03% to 0.02% | A3 to A2 | Aaa | Aa1 |
| Germany | 0.01% | Aaa | Aaa | Aaa |
| Greece | 1.28% to 0.91% | Caa2 to Caa1 | Ca to Caa3 | C |
| Hungary | 0.17% to 0.20% | Ba2 to Ba3 | Ba2 | Ba1 |
| Iceland | 0.09% to 0.10% | Baa3 to Ba1 | Ba2 | Baa3 |
| Ireland | 0.06% to 0.06% | Baa3 | Baa1 | Ba1 |
| Italy | 0.15% to 0.13% | Ba1 | Baa3 to Baa2 | Baa2 |
| Latvia | 0.06% to 0.06% | Baa2 to Baa3 | Baa2 | Baa3 |
| Lithuania | 0.06% to 0.06% | Baa2 | Baa1 | Baa1 |
| Malta | 0.15% to 0.15% | Ba1 | Baa1 | A3 |
| Netherlands | 0.02% to 0.01% | A1 to Aa3 | Aaa | Aaa |
| Norway | 0.01% | Aaa | Aaa | Aaa |
| Poland | 0.04% | Baa1 | A1 to A2 | A2 |
| Portugal | 0.32% to 0.29% | B2 | B1 to Ba3 | Ba3 |
| Romania | 0.11% to 0.11% | Ba1 | Ba1 | Baa3 |
| Russian Federation | 0.10% to 0.11% | Baa3 to Ba1 | Baa2 to Baa1 | Baa1 |
| Slovakia | 0.04% to 0.04% | Baa1 | Aa3 to A1 | A2 |
| Slovenia | 0.28% to 0.25% | B1 to Ba3 | Ba3 to Ba1 | Ba1 |
| Spain | 0.13% to 0.10% | Ba1 to Baa3 | Baa3 to Baa2 | Baa3 |
| Sweden | 0.01% | Aaa | Aaa | Aaa |
| Switzerland | 0.01% to 0.01% | Aa2 to Aa3 | Aaa | Aaa |
| Ukraine | 1.90% to 1.98% | Caa3 to Caa2 | Caa3 to B3 | Caa1 |
Conclusion
The report highlights that while Argentina's market-based risk measures have improved due to a minor dispute resolution, it still faces the highest risk among the analyzed countries. The analysis also underscores the importance of economic policies and the correlation between market signals and financial distress, using historical examples of countries that required financial assistance. The data from various regions shows varying degrees of risk, with some countries maintaining stable ratings and others experiencing fluctuations.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载