2015年-世界发展银行全球_FY15_Chad_Country_Opinion_Survey_Report_173页_3mb

FY 2015 Chad Country Opinion Survey Report Summary

Core Content

This report presents the findings of the FY 2015 Chad Country Opinion Survey conducted by the World Bank Group's Public Opinion Research Group (PORG). The survey aimed to assess stakeholders' perceptions of the WBG's effectiveness, relevance, and role in Chad's development.

Main Objectives

• To understand how stakeholders in Chad perceive the World Bank Group's work.
• To identify general issues facing Chad and the importance of various development priorities.
• To evaluate the WBG's overall effectiveness and its capacity to achieve development results.
• To assess the WBG's knowledge work and instruments.
• To explore the future role of the WBG in Chad and its communication and outreach strategies.

Methodology

• Conducted from April to June 2015.
• 401 stakeholders were invited to participate.
• 277 stakeholders responded (69% response rate).
• Participants were from various sectors including government, private sector, NGOs, academia, and media.
• Data was collected through in-person, courier, and email methods.
• The survey included indicator questions that would be aggregated into the WBG's annual Corporate Scorecard.

Key Findings

Demographics of the Sample

• Respondents were categorized based on their roles and organizations.
• Groups such as the President/Prime Minister office, ministries, and consultants on WBG projects were combined for analysis.
• The private sector, financial institutions, and NGOs were grouped under "CSO".
• A small number of respondents from local government, judiciary, and other agencies were included in the "Other" category.

General Issues Facing Chad

• Stakeholders from the President/Prime Minister office and ministries were more positive about Chad's development prospects.
• The private sector was more skeptical about the country's direction.
• "Education" was identified as the most important development priority by education specialists (15% of the sample).
• "Finance & Markets" specialists (19% of the sample) emphasized "public sector governance/reform" as the most important priority.
• "Anti-corruption", "rural development", and "economic growth" were seen as the most effective areas for poverty reduction by finance & markets specialists.

Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group

• Stakeholders from the President/Prime Minister office and Parliamentarians had the highest ratings of the WBG's overall effectiveness.
• Private sector and financial institutions had lower ratings.
• The WBG's effectiveness in "anti-corruption", "water and sanitation", and "economic growth" were key drivers of its overall effectiveness.
• The WBG's effectiveness in "education", "information and communications technology", and "agricultural development" were key drivers of its ability to achieve development results.
• "Investment lending" was identified as the most effective instrument for poverty reduction by private sector stakeholders.
• The WBG was seen as less effective in capacity building by academia and think tanks.
• The greatest weaknesses identified were "lack of citizen/civil society participation" and "insufficient knowledge translation into local languages".

Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness

• The WBG's work in the education sector was rated highly by education specialists.
• Collaboration with the WBG significantly increased the frequency of knowledge usage.
• Respondents from the private sector and financial institutions were most likely to agree that the WBG's financial instruments met Chad's needs.
• The WBG was rated as most adaptable to Chad's specific development challenges by Parliamentarians.

How the WBG Operates

• The WBG's work was most aligned with development priorities by Parliamentarians and private sector stakeholders.
• The WBG was seen as more responsive and flexible by Parliamentarians.
• Collaboration with civil society and the private sector was highly valued by Parliamentarians.
• The level of collaboration with the WBG significantly affected perceptions of its effectiveness.
• Stakeholders indicated that the WBG's collaboration with the UN had remained stable over the past year.

Knowledge and Instruments

• The WBG's knowledge work and activities were most frequently consulted by employees of ministries, academia, CSOs, and the media.
• Collaborators rated the technical quality of the WBG's knowledge work higher than non-collaborators.
• The WBG's knowledge was seen as adaptable by Parliamentarians but less translated into local languages by private sector stakeholders.

Future Role of the WBG in Chad

• Stakeholders from the private sector and financial institutions emphasized the need for the WBG to collaborate more with "beneficiaries" and "private sector".
• CSOs and ministry employees suggested increased collaboration with "NGOs/Community-based organizations".
• The WBG should focus on "private sector", "civil society", and "local communities" to enhance its value.
• There was a call for greater selectivity in the WBG's support to ensure it is more targeted and impactful.

Conclusion

The survey highlights the varied perceptions of the WBG's role in Chad, with public sector stakeholders generally more positive than private sector and financial institution respondents. The WBG's effectiveness is influenced by its ability to engage with civil society, deliver technical quality knowledge, and align its work with national priorities. Future recommendations include increased collaboration with non-governmental groups and a more targeted approach to development support.

Key Stakeholder Groups

• Government Offices: Most positive about the WBG's effectiveness and alignment with national priorities.
• Private Sector/Financial Institutions: More skeptical and emphasized the need for increased collaboration and citizen participation.
• Academia/Research Institutes/Think Tanks: Lower ratings for overall effectiveness and higher emphasis on knowledge translation.
• CSOs: Suggested increased collaboration with NGOs and civil society.
• Ministry Employees/Consultants: Had mixed perceptions but were more likely to use WBG knowledge work.

Key Areas of Focus

• Education
• Public Sector Governance/Reform
• Anti-Corruption
• Rural Development
• Economic Growth
• Agricultural Development
• Information and Communications Technology

Key Recommendations

• Increase collaboration with civil society and the private sector.
• Improve the translation of WBG knowledge into local languages.
• Enhance responsiveness and flexibility in operations.
• Focus on areas such as education, anti-corruption, and economic growth.
• Strengthen the WBG's local presence and staffing in Chad.

Appendices

• Detailed responses to individual indicator questions are provided in Appendices G and H.
• Geographic and demographic comparisons are available in Appendix C.
• Additional insights on collaboration and effectiveness are in Appendix H.