2011年-世界发展银行全球_The_Role_of_Liquefied_Petroleum_Gas_in_Reducing_Energy_Poverty_108页_1mb
报告摘要
The Role of Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Reducing Energy Poverty
Core Content
This document explores the role of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in addressing energy poverty in developing countries, particularly in the context of achieving universal access to clean cooking and heating solutions by 2030, as outlined by the United Nations' Sustainable Energy for All Initiative. It provides an in-depth analysis of factors influencing LPG use, the state of LPG markets, and policy options for governments and industry to promote its adoption.
Main Points
1. Household Use of LPG
- LPG is predominantly used by households in the upper half of income groups in low- and lower-middle-income countries.
- Higher household income and lower relative fuel prices increase the likelihood of LPG adoption.
- Education levels, especially among women, significantly influence the decision to use LPG, though the effect is not as strong when controlling for gender-specific economic conditions.
- LPG use increases with wealth quintile in 51 out of 63 countries with such data, indicating that universal price subsidies may be regressive.
2. Economic and Market Considerations
- World LPG prices have more than doubled over the past decade, with an annual average increase of 9% since 2001.
- High LPG prices make it unaffordable for the poor, despite some households being financially capable of paying for it.
- Small LPG cylinders (3–6 kg) are more affordable and easier to transport, but are only common in countries with large subsidies.
- Larger cylinders (10–15 kg) are preferred in most countries due to a balance between refill costs and economies of scale.
3. Challenges in LPG Markets
- LPG markets in developing countries face challenges such as high costs, weak regulatory frameworks, inadequate safety information, and fuel shortages.
- Subsidies are often unsustainable and regressive, especially in countries with significant automotive LPG markets.
- Safety issues arise from poor cylinder management, including cross-filling and lack of maintenance, which can be mitigated through better regulation and enforcement.
4. Government and Industry Options
- Governments can support LPG adoption by modernizing regulatory frameworks, improving infrastructure, and reducing subsidies.
- Public awareness campaigns and education are critical for promoting LPG use, especially in addressing safety concerns and the benefits of cleaner fuels.
- Industry associations and LPG marketers can enhance consumer access by lowering the upfront costs of cylinders and stoves, and by promoting training and education.
Key Information
- LPG as a Transition Fuel: LPG is a viable transition fuel for many households, especially those without access to natural gas or reliable electricity.
- Market Dynamics: Efficient supply chains, economies of scale, and third-party access to infrastructure (e.g., import terminals) can reduce costs and improve market accessibility.
- Subsidy Impact: Universal price subsidies for LPG are regressive and may not effectively target the poorest households.
- Safety and Regulation: Strong regulatory frameworks, consumer education, and cylinder management practices are essential for ensuring safe LPG use.
- Data and Surveys: The study draws on data from 110 developing countries, with detailed analysis from 10 and 20 countries respectively, to assess LPG use patterns and market conditions.
Conclusion
The document concludes that while LPG has the potential to reduce energy poverty, its adoption is heavily influenced by economic factors, infrastructure, and policy. Governments and industry must work together to ensure affordability, safety, and awareness, and to reform subsidy policies that are regressive and unsustainable. With the right measures, LPG can become a more accessible and widely used clean energy solution in developing countries.
Summary of Key Findings
- LPG Use by Income: LPG is primarily used by higher-income households, with use increasing with wealth quintile.
- Affordability: At current prices, LPG is unaffordable for the poor, requiring monthly incomes above $350.
- Market Structure: LPG markets vary widely, with some countries being net importers and others self-sufficient.
- Subsidy Issues: Subsidies are often regressive and unsustainable, leading to fuel shortages and inefficiencies.
- Safety Concerns: Poor cylinder management and lack of consumer education pose significant risks.
- Policy Recommendations: Governments should focus on modernizing regulations, improving infrastructure, and promoting public awareness to facilitate LPG adoption.
Figures and Tables
-
Figures:
- 2.1: Evolution of Monthly Prices for LPG, Natural Gas, and Kerosene Since 2003
- 2.2: Monthly Prices for Autogas and Gasoline in Asia
- 3.1: LPG and Biomass as the Primary Cooking Fuel
- 3.2: Monthly Household LPG Consumption by User Households by Quintile
- 4.1: End-User Prices of LPG in December 2010
- 4.2: Estimated Household Consumption of LPG in 2009
- 4.3: Share of Household Income Required to Be Spent on LPG for Regular Use
- 4.4: End-User Prices of LPG With and Without Taxes and Other Government Charges in December 2010
- 5.1: Hypothetical Retail LPG Price, Monthly Household Expenditure on LPG, and Minimum Total Monthly Household Expenditure Needed for Regular Use of LPG
-
Tables:
- 3.1: Survey Descriptions and Country Characteristics
- 3.2: Summary Statistics on LPG Use
- 3.3: Affordability of LPG
- 3.4: Distributional Performance of Hypothetical Universal Price Subsidies
- 4.1: Population, GDP, and Currency Statistics in 2010 for Countries Selected
- 4.2: Number of Wholesale LPG Distributors and Degree of Market Concentration
- 4.3: Legislation and Regulatory Agency in Sample Countries
- 4.4: Pricing Policy for LPG in Sample Countries
- 4.5: Examples of Information Available on Government Web Sites
- 4.6: Examples of Information Available on Non-Government Web Sites
- 5.1: Examples of Options for Facilitating Household Use of LPG
- A.1: Heckman Model for LPG in Countries with Household-Level Prices
- A.2: Unconditional Marginal Effects
- B.1: Sources of Data for Figures 4.2 and 4.3 and Table 4.2
- B.2: Sources of Data for Figure 4.4
Abbreviations
| Abbreviation | Full Form |
|---|---|
| ANP | Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis (National Agency for Oil, Natural Gas, and Biofuels), Brazil |
| ANRE | Agençõesia Nacionale pentru Reglementare in Energetica (National Energy Regulatory Agency), Moldova |
| API | American Petroleum Institute |
| ASTM | American Society for Testing and Materials |
| Btu | British thermal units |
| EPDK | Enerji Piyasasi Düzenleme Kurumu (Energy Market Regulatory Authority), Turkey |
| EPPO | Energy Policy and Planning Office, Thailand |
| ERC | Energy Regulatory Commission, Kenya |
| FOB | Free on Board |
| GDP | Gross Domestic Product |
| IEA | International Energy Agency |
| ISO | International Organization for Standardization |
| kg | Kilogram(s) |
| LPG | Liquefied Petroleum Gas |
| LPGSASA | Liquefied Petroleum Gas Safety Association of Southern Africa |
| NERSA | National Energy Regulator of South Africa |
| NFPA | U.S. National Fire Protection Association |
| NPA | National Petroleum Authority, Ghana |
| OGRA | Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority, Pakistan |
| OSINERGMIN | Organismo Supervisor de la Inversión en Energía y Mineria (Supervisory Agency for Energy and Mining Investment), Peru |
| PPP | Purchasing Power Parity |
| UPPF | Uniform Price Petroleum Fund, Ghana |
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载