2024-03-30-世界卫生组织-GLAAS_2024-2025_-_Country_feedback_form_4页_1mb

报告摘要

UN-WATER GLAAS 2024 Country Feedback Summary

WHO launched the GLAAS 2024/2025 cycle to enhance national monitoring systems and decision-making for sanitation and drinking-water. Countries are invited to complete a feedback form by October 15, 2024, sharing insights on how GLAAS is integrated into national processes.

Key Findings from Country Feedback

Part A: Use of GLAAS in National Processes

Complementarity: GLAAS complements other national initiatives, such as SDG tracking and WASH sector planning, by providing standardized data for evidence-based policies.
Added Value: Participation offers benefits, including improved transparency, accountability, and access to global data for better resource allocation and policy development.
Data Use Plans: Many countries plan to use GLAAS data to strengthen monitoring systems, inform policies, and track progress. Descriptions include integrating data into national reports and strategy reviews.
Impact on Changes: While some countries report minor improvements in coordination and monitoring systems, significant changes in policies, funding, or regional reporting are limited. Examples include enhanced inter-ministry collaboration under sector coordination.

Part B: Feedback on GLAAS Process

Time and Resources: Response times vary, often requiring multiple days, with involvement from several government ministries and institutions.
Ministries Involved: Common participants include the Ministry of Health and Ministry of Finance. Climate resilience ministries are sometimes engaged.
Stakeholders and Meetings: Both government and non-governmental entities (e.g., NGOs and donors) are involved in some cases, with a mix of stakeholder reviews and individual contributions. No large national meetings were typically held as part of GLAAS.
Documentation and Funding: Data collection relies heavily on existing documents and evidence. Funding is often government-supported, but external sources like donors are used in some instances. Minor suggestions include simplifying processes and improving communication.

Part C: Feedback on GLAAS Country Survey

Survey Value Assessment: Countries rate the survey as good to excellent for assessing WASH systems, particularly in monitoring and governance sections.
Improvement Suggestions: Common feedback highlights the need for clearer instructions, shorter questionnaires, and more user-friendly tools to enhance data usability and reduce response burdens.

Questions submitted by the system: