2017瑞典50强品牌报告(英文版)_10页-2mb
报告摘要
Summary of Brand Finance Sweden 50 2017
Core Content
The Brand Finance Sweden 50 2017 report provides an annual assessment of the most valuable Swedish brands, highlighting their financial impact and brand strength. It emphasizes the importance of brand valuation as a tool for aligning marketing efforts with financial outcomes, enabling businesses to make informed decisions about branding, investment, and strategy.
Main Purpose
- To demonstrate the financial value of brands and how they contribute to business performance.
- To bridge the gap between marketing and finance teams by offering a clear, quantifiable language for brand value.
- To provide insights into brand strength, brand contribution, and the broader economic impact of brands on stakeholders.
Key Information
Brand Value
- IKEA topped the list with a brand value of $24.1 billion, showing a 42% increase from 2016.
- H&M ranked second with a brand value of $19.2 billion, up by 24%.
- Nordea, Swedbank, Svenska Handelsbanken, and SEB were among the top 10, with Nordea being the highest in the banking sector.
- Ericsson experienced a significant drop in brand value, decreasing by 47% to $5.0 billion, reflecting its financial challenges.
Brand Strength Index (BSI)
- The BSI is used to assess brand strength, with scores ranging from AAA+ to D.
- IKEA and H&M had strong BSI scores, with IKEA rated AA and H&M AAA.
- Ericsson dropped from AA+ to AA in 2017, indicating a weakening brand position.
Methodology
- Brand values are calculated using the Royalty Relief approach, which estimates future sales attributable to a brand and applies a royalty rate.
- The Brand Strength Index (BSI) is calculated based on marketing investment, brand equity, and business performance.
- Brand values are then discounted to a net present value (NPV) to reflect their financial worth.
Main Points
Brand Contribution
- Brand Contribution represents the uplift in shareholder value due to the brand.
- It helps businesses understand the broader impact of their brand beyond just financial transactions.
Brand Value Changes
- IKEA showed the highest growth in brand value.
- H&M also saw substantial growth, though slightly less than IKEA.
- Ericsson had a major decline, while some other brands, such as Swedbank, showed improvement.
Stakeholder Impact
- Brands influence not only customers but also staff, partners, and investors.
- The report highlights the importance of understanding these impacts to maximize financial returns.
Brand Strategy and Management
- The report discusses the importance of brand extension, rebranding, and brand architecture in driving long-term growth.
- It also mentions the need for a clear brand strategy to avoid dilution of brand value.
Key Brands
| Rank | Brand Name | Sector | Brand Value (USDm) | % Change | Brand Rating 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IKEA | Retail | 24,119 | 42% | AA |
| 2 | H&M | Apparel | 19,177 | 24% | AAA |
| 3 | Nordea | Banks | 5,600 | 1% | AA |
| 4 | Ericsson | Technology | 5,047 | -47% | AA |
| 5 | Telia Company | Telecoms | 4,614 | -16% | AA |
| 6 | Volvo | Automobiles | 3,572 | -11% | AA+ |
| 7 | Swedbank | Banks | 2,910 | 19% | AAA- |
| 8 | Svenska Handelsbanken | Banks | 2,893 | -10% | AA+ |
| 9 | SEB | Banks | 2,480 | -10% | AA+ |
| 10 | Skanska | Engineering & Construction | 2,339 | 0% | A+ |
How We Can Help
Brand Finance offers services to help businesses:
- Valuation: Assess the value of intangible assets and branded businesses.
- Analytics: Improve marketing effectiveness by identifying demand drivers and consumer insights.
- Transactions: Provide support for M&A, licensing, and transfer pricing to maximize the value of intangible assets.
Conclusion
The report underscores the importance of understanding and managing brand value as a strategic asset. It highlights the need for clear brand strategies, effective marketing communication, and financial rigor in brand valuation to ensure long-term business success.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载